Some open source projects don't always listen to contributors' feedback. We reported a couple errors that we found in OpenStack documentation to openstack.org. Here are the errors we saw (as of 2/2/17):
#1 If you go to this link, you'll find two "Storm EDP" links:
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/sahara-specs/
One points to this link: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/sahara-specs/specs/liberty/storm-scaling.html
We see no reason why the title/header of this above page is "Storm EDP" and not "Storm Scaling." My attempt at a contribution was to not have two "Storm EDP" links in the first link of this post.
#2 We found this ungrammatical sentence here (which needs the word "needs" instead of "need"):
"Sahara need more flexible way to work with security groups." This was taken from: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/sahara-specs/specs/juno/cluster-secgroups.html
The OpenStack Foundation probably has limited resources. But if they had a way to listen to each person's contributions, progress would be more rapid. The more requests are ignored, the less likely contributions will be made.